Origin and metallogenic significance of the porphyry intrusions in the Yulong porphyry Cu deposit, Xizang
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

P618.41;P588.12+1

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The Yulong giant porphyry Cu deposit is located in the eastern margin of the Tibet Plateau. It is a typical representative of collisional porphyry copper deposits. Recent studies indicate disparities in the mineralization potential between the ore-forming and ore-bearing porphyries of the Yulong deposit. Here we present whole-rock main/trace elements, whole-rock Sr-Nd, zircon U-Pb, and zircon trace elements data for ore-bearing monzogranite porphyry and ore-forming granite porphyry of the Yulong deposit to delve into the magmagenesis of this deposit and the intrinsic factors influencing its mineralization potential. Zircon U-Pb dating shows that the Yulong porphyry were emplaced at ca. 42~41 Ma. Monzogranite porphyry and granite porphyry have similar Sr-Nd ratio, including high (87Sr/86Sr)i (0.706 0~0.707 6 and 0.706 2~0.706 7) with low εNd(t) (-2.9~-2.0 and -4.6~-1.9). High K2O (the average>4%), low MgO, Mg# and Cr, significant negative Nb and Tb anomalies, low Nb/U and Ce/Pb ratios were derived from partial melting of a thickened lower crust. Combine with adakitic signatures of monzogranite, including high SiO2, Al2O3 and Sr contents, low Y and Yb contents with high Sr/Y and La/Yb ratios, we propose that the Yulong metallogenic mother magma originated from the partial melting of the Cenozoic lower crust. Zircon trace-element analysis shows that the two porphyries of Yulong have high Eu/Eu*(>0.44), 10 000×(Eu/Eu*)/Y(>3.6), (Ce/Nd)/Y(>0.01) and lower Dy/Yb (<0.31, average 0.22), suggesting that both porphyries have high and similar magma water content. Moreover, trace elements in zircons shows that monzogranite porphyry ΔFMQ= 0.29~2.29 (average 1.44), and granite porphyry ΔFMQ=1.07~2.74(average 1.80). They both have high magmatic oxygen fugacity, but the granite porphyry has a larger range of variation. In addition, the oxygen fugacity is higher than that of monzogranite, suggesting that different oxygen fugacity may affect the differences in mineralization.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

孙茂妤,代作文,刘申态,李秋耘,周怿惟,杨志明,侯增谦,2024,西藏玉龙斑岩铜矿床成矿斑岩起源及成矿意义[J].岩石矿物学杂志,43(6):1578~1600. SUN Mao-yu, DAI Zuo-wen, LIU Shen-tai, LI Qiu-yun, ZHOU Yi-wei, YANG Zhi-ming, HOU Zeng-qian,2024,Origin and metallogenic significance of the porphyry intrusions in the Yulong porphyry Cu deposit, Xizang[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica,43(6):1578~1600.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:July 20,2024
  • Revised:September 30,2024
  • Adopted:
  • Online: November 20,2024
  • Published: November 25,2024
Article QR Code