Geochemistry of magnetites from the Lietinggang iron polymetallic deposit in Tibet and its geological significance
DOI:
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The Lietinggang deposit is a newly discovered typical large-sized polymetallic deposit in the Fe-Mo-Cu-Pb-Zn ore concentration area of the Linzhou basin. There are mainly three types of magnetites in this mining area, i.e., massive, disseminated and veined magnetite. On the basis of detailed geological survey and systematic mineralogical studies, the metallogenic period of this deposit can be divided into two periods, i.e., skarn period and hydrothermal and supergene period, which include five ore-forming stages: early skarn stage, degradation and alteration stage, early hydrothermal stage, quartz-sulfide stage and carbonatization stage. The massive magnetite mainly formed at the degradation and alteration stage, whereas both the disseminated and veined magnetites formed at the early hydrothermal stage. In this study, the authors selected the magnetites as the main object of study and used electron microprobe analysis (EPMA) and rare earth trace elements ICP-MS experiments to gain an insight into the geochemical characteristics and minerageny of magnetites. The results show that three different types of magnetites (massive, veined and disseminated magnetites) contain Ti, Si, Ca and other minor elements such as Na, K, Cr, Ni, Co, Pb, Ba, Sn. In addition, a variety of trace elements like Sr, Sb and Cu can be detected. There are mainly Al, Mg and Mn replacing the other elements. Combining TiO2-Al2O3-MgO, TiO2-Al2O3-(MgO+MnO) and (Ca+Al+Mn)-(Ti+V), Ni/(Cr+Mn)-(Ti+V), and other discrimination diagrams with orefield geological characteristics, the authors have reached the conclusion that the magnetites of the Lietinggang deposit belong to hydrothermal magnetite. The massive magnetite has obvious positive Eu anomaly, the disseminated and veined magnetites show negative Eu anomaly, and they all have no significant Ce anomalies. The massive magnetites might have been formed in an environment of high oxidation and temperature with the fluids rich in Eu. At the hydrothermal stage, the fluids were gradually transformed into a low temperature and oxidation which could contribute to the formation of disseminated, veined magnetites and a large quantity of sulfides. Moreover, the main sources of iron materials were related to granodiorite and porphyry granite.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

李壮,唐菊兴,王立强,杨毅,钟毅,2016,西藏列廷冈铁多金属矿床磁铁矿元素地球化学特征及地质意义[J].岩石矿物学杂志,35(5):821~839. LI Zhuang, TANG Ju-xing, WANG Li-qiang, YANG Yi, ZHONG Yi,2016,Geochemistry of magnetites from the Lietinggang iron polymetallic deposit in Tibet and its geological significance[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica,35(5):821~839.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:November 04,2015
  • Revised:April 08,2016
  • Adopted:
  • Online: September 23,2016
  • Published:
Article QR Code